Complex Immigration Litigation & Agency Challenges
Some immigration matters cannot be resolved through a routine application. The firm handles contested findings, adverse agency decisions, removal orders, and cases involving unusual legal or factual issues.
Challenging fraud and marriage-fraud findings
The firm has experience overturning adverse immigration fraud determinations through administrative advocacy and federal court litigation. Cases may involve alleged misrepresentation under INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i), marriage-fraud bars under INA § 204(c), and disputes over the agency’s evidence, procedural fairness, and legal standards.
Adam Walsh Act petition restrictions
Mr. Langer has successfully contested adverse Adam Walsh Act determinations affecting family-based petitions. These matters can require close examination of the qualifying offense, statutory restrictions, evidentiary record, and the applicable no-risk determination.
Administrative and federal remedies
Depending on the decision, potential avenues include agency motions and appeals, review of the administrative record, APA litigation, mandamus, or other federal proceedings. Jurisdiction, exhaustion, and filing deadlines must be evaluated before filing.
Read more: Adam Walsh Act and fraud-related petition denials
